Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27557 (MAD)

Mr. Sembana Gounder Chinnusamy Senthilkumar v. The State Tax Officer/

WP/17940/2026 · 2026-06-02

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:1858 WP No. 17940 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 17940 of 2026 and WMP Nos. 19274 & 19276 of 2026 Mr.Sembana Gounder Chinnusamy Senthilkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Tax Officer/ The Commercial Tax Officer, Chithode Assessment Circle, Erode. 2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Erode, 131, Brough Road, Commercial Taxes Building, Erode- 638001. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the files pertaining to Form DRC-07 vide Ref. No. ZD330225253262T dated 25.02.2025, along with a detailed order annexed thereon vide GSTIN: 33BPHPS8167M1Z4 /2020-21 dated 25.02.2025 passed by the 1st Respondent, and the Form GST APL-02 vide Ref. No. ZD330126176314M dated 27.01.2026 passed by the 2nd Respondent, and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Neshapriyan For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:1858 WP No. 17940 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The Original Order dated 25.02.2025 and the Appeal Order dated 27.01.2026 are challenged in this writ petition primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax) accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that said orders were issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand (after giving credit to the 10% pre-deposit made while filing the appeal) within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned orders are set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of the said 25% of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:1858 WP No. 17940 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 disputed tax demand. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Jeni To 1.The State Tax Officer/ The Commercial Tax Officer, Chithode Assessment Circle, Erode. 2.The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Erode, 131, Brough Road, Commercial Taxes Building, Erode- 638001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:1858 WP No. 17940 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. Jeni WP No. 17940 of 2026 02-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis