Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2755 (JHR)

MURLIDHAR PRASAD v. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION

WPC/5296/2012 · 2026-04-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:9521] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(C) No. 5296 of 2012 Murlidhar Prasad, son of Late Uma Kant Lal, resident of Bishunpur Road, at Jhumri Telaiya, Ward No.1, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District Koderma. ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Deputy Commissioner-cum-Registrar, Koderma, P.O. and P.S.-Koderma, District-Koderma. 3. Sub-Registrar, Koderma, P.O. and P.S.-Koderma, District-Koderma. 4. Secretary, Revenue Registration and Land Reform Department, Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi. ..... … Respondents -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : None. For the Resps.-State : Ms. Shalini Shahdeo, A.C. to S.C.(L&C)-I. ------ 15/ 06.04.2026 Nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the State is present. 2. Earlier on 08.02.2023, nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was adjourned for 22.02.2023. Further on 17.04.2023, nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was further adjourned for 17.05.2023. On 23.07.2025, the matter was again adjourned by way of last chance to the petitioner. Again on 13.01.2026, further nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was adjourned. Today, again on repeated calls, no body has responded on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter. As such, this writ petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-06.04.2026 Amitesh/-