IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (109) CRM-M-34256-2026 Sahil Deep Singh @ Shally and another ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 09.07.2026 Date of uploading: 09.07.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Kachura, Advocate for the petitioner (s). Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. S.S. Killianwali, Advocate for the complainant. Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, Advocate for the victim. ***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral): 1. Apprehending their arrest in FIR No.75, Dated 24.03.2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 191(3), 190, 324 (4) of BNS 2023, at Police Station City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib; the petitioners have preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, at the outset, has submitted that petitioner No.2 stands arrested & hence the petition has been rendered infructuous qua petitioner No.2. 3. Ordered accordingly. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.09 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CRM-M-34256-2026 -2- 4. As regards, petitioner No.1, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, on account of inadvertence, complete antecedents of the petitioner could not be disclosed in the petition. He seeks to withdraw the petition in hand qua petitioner No.1, with liberty to file afresh, on the same cause of action, after disclosing complete antecedents of the petitioner No.1. 5. Ordered accordingly. (SUMEET GOEL) July 09, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.09 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh