1 APHC010700132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36273/2025 Between: 1. R THIPPA REDDY, AGE 68YRS S/O R.YERRISWAMY, R/O D.NO.19- 3-2J/F1/A20, K.K.CHERUVU, DR.AMBEDKAR GLOBAL LAW INSTITUTE, RENIGUNTA ROAD TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 517507 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. TIRUPATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TIRUPATI.517501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Provisional order notice no. 189/1012/TPT/UC/2025 Dt.18/11/2025 under Sec452(1) and 461(1) of AP Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 .without verifying the ownership details, records related to site and plan approval and terming as without obtaining any plan for the constructions going on in Survey No.3/2c/2E2 ward no 19, Kaikala Cheruvu, Tirupati in an extent of 844.51 Sq.mts available with them is illegal and arbitrary and consequently 2 suspend the notice issued by the 2nd respondent Vide notice no.189/1012/TPT/ UC/2025 Dt.18/11/2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the notice No.189/1012/TPT/UC/2025 Dt. 18/11/2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3 APHC010700092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36305/2025 Between: 1. R THIPPA REDDY, AGE 68YRS S/O R.YERRISWAMY, R/O D.NO.19- 3-2J/F1/A20, K.K.CHEMVU, DR.AMBEDKAR GLOBAL LAW INSTITUTE, RENIGUNTA ROAD TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5017507 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.- 522237 2. TIRUPATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TIRUPATI. 517501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Provisional order notice no. 188/1012/TPT/UC/2025 Dt.18/11/2025 under Sec452(1) and 461(1) of AP Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 Dt.without verifying the ownership details, records related to site and plan approval and terming as without obtaining any plan for the constructions going on in Survey No.3/2c/2E2 ward no 19, Kaikala Cheruvu, Tirupati in an extent of 1093.91 Sq.mts available with them is illegal and arbitrary and consequently suspend 4 the notice issued by the 2nd respondent Vide notice no.188/1012/TPT/UC/2025 Dt.18/11/2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the notice No.188/1012/TPT/UC/2025 Dt.18/11/2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NOS: 36273 and 36305 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of the impugned notice dated 18.11.2025, whereby the petitioner has been called upon to stop further work, as the 2nd respondent has noticed several deviations from the sanctioned plan. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the Secretary of the Educations Society and that permission was obtained by the society. However, the impugned notice has been issued individually to the petitioner. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a reply on 09.12.2025. It is further submitted that the 2nd respondent, without passing any orders, has been sending their men who are constantly interfering with the construction activity. 3. Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent No.2, on oral instructions, submits that the building permission was obtained in the name of Sri Lakshmi Venkateswara Education Society, which is represented by the petitioner himself, and that after noticing the deviations, the show cause notice was issued. 4. Considering the submissions that the building permission was obtained in the name of Sri Lakshmi Venkateswara Education Society, the impugned notice dated 18.11.2025 ought to have been issued in the name of the applicant in whose favor the building permit order was issued. 6 5. On these considerations, the impugned notices are hereby set aside, and it is left open for the 2nd respondent to issue appropriate notice to the appropriate authorities calling for an explanation regarding the deviations, if any, found. 6. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:07.01.2026 NKA 7 219 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NOs: 36273 and 36305 of 2025 Date: 07.01.2025 NKA