TULU @ ABHISHEK CHOUDHARY @ ABHISHEK SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2740/2026 · 2026-04-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2754 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2754 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026:JHHC:9513) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2740 of 2026
Tulu @ Abhishek Choudhary @ Abhishek Singh, aged about 20 years, son of Murari Singh @ Murari Kumar, resident of village – Pandariya, PO – Patluka, PS – Dhangai, District – Gaya Ji (Bihar). … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sushant Kr. Sinha, Advocate
: Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------
Order No:- 02, Dated:- 06th April, 2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No. 439 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 along with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that at the gunpoint, the petitioner committed robbery and looted jewelry from the informant while the informant was going in a car. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and fabricated. It is next submitted that T.I. Parade has not yet been conducted yet charge-sheet has been submitted. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.11.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph nos. 1 and 12 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub - Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No. 439 of 2025, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Aditi