Ganesan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Munneerpallam
CRL OP(MD)/9878/2026 · 2026-05-27
K Murali Shankar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27536 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27536 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.9878 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.05.2026 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.9878 of 2026 Ganesan ... Petitioner
Vs State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police, Munneerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.581 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.581 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Jeganathan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sivasubramanian Counsel for the State of Tamil Ndu (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.9878 of 2026 ORDER The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence under Section 309(4) of BNS and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, in Crime No.581 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a money dispute between the parties, due to which, the petitioner along with the other accused persons attacked the vehicle belonging to the defacto complainant and and took the amount brought by him. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.9878 of 2026 4.The learned Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner is having seven previous case, out of which, one case is similar in nature. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the offences alleged, which are serious in nature and taking note of the damages allegedly caused and that the petitioner is involved in seven previous cases, of which, one case is similar in nature, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
27.05.2026 mm To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.4, Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police, Munneerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.9878 of 2026 K.MURALI SHANKAR,J mm
CRL OP(MD) No.9878 of 2026 27.05.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis