1 CGHC010242962026 2026:CGHC:30543-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1857 of 2026 1. Smt. Shilpa Kashyap W/o Dhiraj Kashyap Aged About 30 Years R/o Sai Nagar, Uslapur, P.S.- Sakari, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Smt. Dhiraj Kashyap S/o Moolchand Kashyap Aged About 37 Years R/o Sai Nagar, Uslapur, P.S.- Sakari, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S.- Sakari, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Chandrika Bai Sahu W/o Kumar Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Sai Nagar, Uslapur, P.S.- Sakari, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 20.07.2026 1. Heard Mr. Shyam Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.07.20 17:25:22 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and kindly set aside/quash the FIR/Crime No. 90 of 2026 registered at P.S. Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 296, 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in the present case, the charge-sheet has already been filed before the learned trial Court. Since the present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR, he prays that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to avail such other remedy as may be available to them in accordance with law. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to avail such remedy as may be available to them in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. 6. Certified copies of the FIR and other documents, if any, filed by the petitioners, be returned to them after retaining photocopies thereof on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan