APHC010698722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 20/2026 Between: 1. GUTHULA LAXMI DEVI (DIED), (DIED) W/O LATE BULLI SWAMY, R/O. D.NO. 3-2, VENDRAVARIPALEM, IRRAGAVARAM,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. GUTHULA SWAMY VINAY,, S/O G. TULASIGIRI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O H.NO. 7-5-94, PANDURANGAPURAM, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, VISAKAPATNAM, A.P ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. YELLAMILLI VEERA VENKATA VIKRAMASENA JWALA, S/O VIVEKANANDA SWAMY,AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO. 204, D.NO. 1-7-131/31, ANITHA APTS, JAMISTAPUR, HARFINAGAR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. Y VIVEKANANDA SWAMY, W/O SRINIVASARAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO. 204, D.NO. 1-7-131/31, ANITHA APTS, JAMISTAPUR, HARFINAGAR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): The Court made the following order:- 1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the order dated 28.04.2025 passed in I.A. No.1 of 2023 in O.S. No.36 of 2018 by the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tanuku. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to an accident, the counsel for the petitioner could not file the application for condonation of delay before the Court below within the stipulated time. It is further contended that the Court below ought to have considered the explanation furnished along with the application. However, the Court below dismissed the interlocutory application vide order dated 28.04.2025. 3. Upon perusal of the record, this Court finds that there is no satisfactory explanation for the delay and, therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order dated 28.04.2025 passed by the Court below in I.A. No.1 of 2023. 4. Considering the above, the matter is remanded to the Court below, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application along with sufficient material, if any. If such an application is filed, the Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :19.01.2026 klk 225 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH C.R.P. No.20 of 2026 19.01.2026 kkllkk