- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35265 CRL.RP No. 1898 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1898 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. C.S. NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O SHIVEGOWDA, R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-571130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. NATARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PUTTAJYOTHI C.S., AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, W/O NAGESH C.S. 2. MOUNISHA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, D/O NAGESHA. 3. THEJASWINI, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, D/O NAGESHA. RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT GERASANAHALLI VILLAGE, BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35265 CRL.RP No. 1898 of 2025 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU (SITTING AT HUNSUR) IN CRL.A.NO.68/2023 DATED 18.03.2025 AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HUNSUR IN CRL.MISC.NO.794/2016 DATED 31.12.2022, BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This petition is filed against the order passed by the Trial Court directing the revision petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.5,000/- each to wife and two children. The said order was also confirmed by the Appellate Court in Crl.A.No.68/2023 on 18.03.2025. This revision petition was filed on 09.12.2025. Having taken note of the order passed by the Trial Court directing the revision petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.5,000/- each to wife and two children, the cost of living and also the educational - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35265 CRL.RP No. 1898 of 2025 expenses of two children, I do not find any ground to entertain the revision petition on merits. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed and consequently, I.A.No.1/2025 is also dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17