Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27519 (CHH)

KHAMMAN LAL v. SANTOSH KUMAR

WP227/825/2026 · 2026-07-12

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010263142026 2026:CGHC:29500 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 825 of 2026 Khamman Lal S/o Late Shri Sukhan Lal Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Daragaon, Tehsil Daundilohara, District Balod (C.G.) (Cause Title Is Taken From Ann. P/5). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Santosh Kumar S/o. Lakhan Lal Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Daragaon, Tehsil Daundilohara, District Balod (C.G.) (Cause Title Is Taken From Ann. P/5) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Balod (C.G.) ( Case Details Not Completely Mentioned In Impugned Order And Ann. P/5 Such As Collector, District Etc.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shubhank Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy. G.A. for the State (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 13/07/2026 SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR 2 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the issue is under consideration before the Hon’ble Full Bench of this Court, therefore, at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to repeat the same after the decision of the Hon’ble Full Bench of this Court. 2. Not opposed by the State counsel. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the annexures to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit