Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27518 (AP)

G.Eswara Reddy v. Smt. Y. V. Anuradha

CC/909/2015 · 2026-02-24

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010692352015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 909/2015 Between: 1. G.ESWARA REDDY,, S/O.LATE G.RAMA LINGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: ASST.DIRECTOR (TECHNICAL), R/O.QTR. NO.A/7, O/O.SRISAILAM SUPERINTENDENT, O/O.EXECUTIVE OFFICER,SRISAILAM SRI BHRAMARAMBA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY VARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT Y V ANURADHA, THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, OFFICE AT BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA 2. K V SAGAR BABU, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BHRAMARAMBA MALLIKARJUNASWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon, try and punish, the Respondents/ Contemnors No.1 & 2 for deliberately and willfully flouting thereby committing Contempt of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated. 09.04.2015, passed in 2 W.P.No.9986/2015, of his Lordship JUSTICE NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S RAYALU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAMANA RAO 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 909/2015 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Interim Order dated 09.04.2015 passed in W.P.No.9986 of 2015. 2. When the matter was taken up, Mr.J.Sunil Kumar, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr.T.S.Rayalu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Contempt Case does not survive for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 25.02.2026 S D P 4 241 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 909/2015 25.02.2026 W S D P