Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27513 (KAR)

RAMESH RAO v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/1052/2023 · 2026-07-08

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34839 WP No. 1052 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 1052 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. RAMESH RAO, S/O BHEEMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT 'SANTHRUPTI NILAYA', A BLOCK, VIDYANAGARA, NEAR CITY FAMILY CLUB, HARIHARA TOWN - 577 601. DAVANGERE DISTRICT. 2. ASHWATHNARAYAN G, S/O LATE GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.912, 1ST CROSS, WEST CHORD ROAD, INDRANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 010. 3. UMAMAHESH N, S/O LATE NANJUNDASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.135, NEAR BASAVANNA TEMPLE, GANIGARA PALYA, THALAGHATTAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 062. Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34839 WP No. 1052 of 2023 4. THIPPESWAMY R, S/O LATE RANGADASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT VEERABOMMANAHALLI, YADALADAKU POST, HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 135. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.C.BASAVARAJU., ADVOCATE) AND: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, 'BEEJA BHAVANA', 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, BALLARY ROAD, HEBBAL, BANGALORE - 560 024. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.SHISHIRA AMARNATH., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REGULARISE THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONERS AS PER THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P.NO.2997-3003/2003 (S-RES) DATED 24.03.2003 VIDE ANNEXURE - B TO THE WRIT PETITION AND TO PAY ALL THE CONSEQUENTIAL FINANCIAL / RETIREMENT BENEFITS TO THE PETITIONERS BY CONSIDERING THEIR JOINT REPRESENTATIONS DATED 13.11.2014 AND 26.10.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND L TO THE WRIT PETITION. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34839 WP No. 1052 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioners filed this petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider their representations dated 13.11.2014 and 26.10.2018 vide Annexures K and L, wherein the petitioners have requested to pay all the consequential financial/retirement benefits to them in terms of the direction issued by this court in W.P.No.2997-3003 of 2003 dated 24.03.2003 vide Annexure-B. The petitioners have submitted representations, but the respondent has not considered them nor passed any orders on the said representations. Hence, this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that if a reasonable time is granted, the respondent will - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34839 WP No. 1052 of 2023 consider the representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, I proceed to pass the following: ORDER i. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the set of representations dated 13.11.2014 and 26.10.2018 vide Annexures K and L respectively, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. ii. In view of disposal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2024 does not survive for consideration, and accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS