Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27513 (AP)

SYED NADIR BASHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/35973/2025 · 2026-01-29

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010693892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 35973/2025 Between: 1. SYED NADIR BASHA, S/O SYED JAFFAR ALL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O H.NO. 148A, NARASIMHA REDDY NAGAR, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. LADDAGIRI MASOOM BASHA, S/O L. ABDUL WAHEED AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RIO H. NO. 45-185-110, NAARASIMHA REDDY NAGAR, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINORITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF A.P., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 238, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE A P STATE WAQF BOARD, REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 4TH FLOOR, IMDADGHAR BUILDINGS, OPP K.R. MARKET, VIJAYAWADA - 520 001, A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518 501, A.P. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, PANYAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT- 518 502, A.P. 5. THE SUBREGISTRAR, PANYAM, NANDYAL DISTRICT- 518 502, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the writ petitioner's representation dated 21- 12-2024 to de-notify the writ petitioner's land to an extent of Ac.0.88 cents (4259 sq yards) in Sy. No. 621/1A, Balapanur Village, Panyam Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibited property list as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider writ petitioner's representation dated 21-12-2024 to de-notify their land to an extent of Ac.0:88 cents (4259 sq yards) in Sy. No. 621/1A, Balapanur Village, Panyam Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibited property list and communicate the same to the respondents 3 to 5 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. J.JYOTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 4. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.35973 of 2025 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the writ petitioner’s representation dated 21.12.2024 to de-notify the writ petitioner’s land to an extent of Ac.0.88 cents (4259 sq yards) in Sy.No.621/1A, Balapanur Village, Panyam Mandal, Nandyal District from the prohibited property list as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the same and pass such other order.…” 2. The short grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is that the petitioners made a representation dated 21.12.2024 to delete the land from the prohibited properties list and to de-notify the petitioners’ land to an extent of Ac.0.88 cents (4259 Sq. yards) in Sy.No.621/1A, Balapanur Village, Panyam Mandal, Nandyal District, from the prohibitory list. 3. Heard Ms.J.Jyothi, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it would suffice to direct the respondents to examine the petitioners’ representation. 5. Learned Government Pleader does not refute the said submission. 6. In view of the said submissions, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent herein to examine the 4 petitioners’ representation dated 21.12.2024 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioners within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 30.01.2026 SCH 5 173 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.35973 of 2025 Date: 30.01.2026 SCH