IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Pawan Kumar State of Punjab & others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari (Annexure P dated 06.02.2026 passed in CWP rejected. the present petition with better particulars 08.07.2026 Vimal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1905 Date of Decision: Pawan Kumar Versus State of Punjab & others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. P.S.Sekhon, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rajdeep Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 30.04.2006 (Annexure P-6), whereby his case was reconsidered in compliance of order dated 06.02.2026 passed in CWP-15521 Learned assisting counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for 08.07.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 19053-2026 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 …Petitioner ...Respondents NAMIT KUMAR P.S.Sekhon, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rajdeep Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ahuja, DAG, Punjab. petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of for quashing of order dated 30.04.2006 6), whereby his case was reconsidered in compliance of order 15521-2024, but the same has been counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action with liberty as prayed for. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Yes/No 105 petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of for quashing of order dated 30.04.2006 6), whereby his case was reconsidered in compliance of order 2024, but the same has been counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw on the same cause of action VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.