Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2750 (JHR)

VIKRAM KAHAR ALIAS MATLU ALIAS VIKRAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10996/2025 · 2026-04-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:9615] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10996 of 2025 ------ Vikram Kahar @ Matlu @ Vikram, Age- 21 years, S/o- Sanatan Kahar, R/o- Tiril Talab, P.O.- Kokar, P.S.- Sadar, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand. Present R/o- Village- Chiraundi, P.O.+P.S.- Bariatu, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate Mr. Dilip Saw, Advocate Ms. Arti Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-06-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 646 of 2025 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2643 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(4), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in committing theft of Scooty of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the stolen Scooty of the informant has already been recovered. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.06.2025 as mentioned in para-1 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb any of the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVII, Ranchi in connection with S.T. Case No. 646 of 2025 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2643 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb any of the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 06.04.2026 Saroj/