D/L – 111 24/03/2026 Court No.6 S.Kundu IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRR 590 of 2025 CRAN 1 OF 2026 Sri Supratim Paul Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Chayan Moni Bhawal …for the petitioner. Mr. Arnab Sengupta Mr. Rajesh Kr. Sharma Mr. Bickey Sharma …for the de-facto complainant. Mr. A.S. Chakraborty Mr. Tapan Bhattacharyya …for the State. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is an inadvertent error in filing the application. Steps were not taken by the advocate on record to hide the identity of the alleged victim. Accordingly, the petitioners would like to press this application with liberty to file a proper application afresh. 2. On such prayer, the revisional application is dismissed for not being in proper form. 3. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application afresh on the self-same grounds. 2 4. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)