Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27490 (AP)

M/S.MEDA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, RAJAMPET,KADAPA DISTRICT v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RAJAMPET ,KADAPA DISTRICT

WP/13170/2010 · 2026-02-01

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010697592010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 13170/2010 Between: 1. M/S.MEDA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, RAJAMPET,KADAPA DISTRICT, S/O.M.V.SUBBA REDDY RAJAMPET,KADAPA DISTRICT,REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER M.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER RAJAMPET KADAPA DISTRICT, S/o.M.V.Subba Reddy Rajampet,Kadapa District,rep.by its Managing partner M.Ramakrishna Reddy ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order of Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring proceedings in CST.No.1693/POR 1 2009- 2010 dated 26.4.2010 (served on 2.6.2010) passed by the respondent is illegal, arbitrary,and consequently siet aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 16596 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of collection of disputed penalty of Rs.21,00,650 under the APVAT Act pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) There was no appearance on 19.01.2026, and the matter was posted for dismissal today. There is no appearance for the petitioner today also. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 02.02.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 13170/2010 Date: 02.02.2026 KA