- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35021-DB CCC No. 1375 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1375 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT AROGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS W/O LATE B.P. CHOWRAPPA @ B. PUTTAIAH 2. SRI RAPALA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE B.P. CHOWRAPPA @ B. PUTTAIAH R/AT GANDHINAGARA LAYOUT KENGERI UPANAGARA BENGALURU - 560 060 BOTH REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER R.S. MADHU KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O R. SHANKARAPPA R/AT NO.31 KENCHENAHALLI VILLAGE RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR 19TH MAIN, 18TH CROSS BENGALURU - 560 098 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI UDAY K.S., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35021-DB CCC No. 1375 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT 2. SMT. ASHWINI G. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 009 …ACCUSED (BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., AGA FOR PRO FORMA RESPONDENT No.1 & ACCUSED No.2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO TAKE SUITABLE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED BY INITIATING THE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 26.06.2025 PASSED IN W.P. NO.14820/2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35021-DB CCC No. 1375 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainants have filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 26.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.No.14820/2025 (KLR-RR/SUR). By the said order the learned Single Judge had permitted the petitioners to file a representation before the accused and further directed that if such a representation is made, the accused shall consider the same and take a decision in the matter. 2. The accused has filed an affidavit, which indicates that the representation was considered and the entries in question have been rectified. 3. In view of the above, the complaint is closed. However, this would not preclude the complainants from availing the substantive remedies, in accordance with law, if any grievance persists. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE SD, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4