10.07.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.42 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 2875 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Palashipara Police Station Case No. 264 of 2024 dated 26.05.2024 under Sections 341/325/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently added Sections 341/302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code (G.R. Case No. 245 of 2025). And In Re : Ijarul Sk. and others ... Petitioners. Mr. Chitta Ranjan Chakraborty, Mr. Md. Abdur Rahaman, Ms. Puspa Rani Jaiswara ... For the Petitioners. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, APP, Mr. Utsav Dutta ... For the State. Mr. Amanul Islam, Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Mr. Gourav Roy ... For the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for 2 years 1 month; although charge-sheet has been submitted and charges have been framed, but witness action has not commenced. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statements of the eyewitnesses which have been recorded by the Judicial Magistrate. 2 On perusal of the materials, it appears that the complicity of the present petitioners is supported by the eyewitnesses. However, having considered the period of detention of the present petitioners and the fact that till date, no witness has been examined and trial of the case would take some more time with the additional factor of the genesis on which the dispute cropped up, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioners in connection with the instant case is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioners viz., 1. Ijarul Sk., 2. Manirul Sk. and 3. Mintu Kazi @ Mintu Kazi shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioners shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, the petitioners shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Palashipara Police Station and petitioners shall report to the Officer-in-Charge/Inspector-in-Charge of the local police station where they would reside. The address of the petitioners be furnished before release to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. 3 The application for bail, being CRM (M) 2875 of 2025, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)