Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27481 (CAL)

PRADIP MONDAL AND ORS v. HARSIMRAN SINGH

WPCRC/62/2026 · 2026-07-07

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.07.2026 Sl. No.6 Ct. No.14 ss IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPCRC 62 of 2026 in W.P.A. No. 7072 of 2023 Sri Pradip Mondal & ors. Versus Sri Harswimran Singh, Additional District Magistrate (Land Acquisition), South 24-Parganas Mr. Parha Pratim Roy Ms. Paulami Chakraborty … for the applicant-petitioner Mrs. Sudipa Banerjee Ms. Manisha Paswan … for the alleged contemnor 1. This matter is appearing in the list under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’. 2. Compliance report filed by the alleged contemnor dated 15th June, 2026 is taken on record. 3. Mrs. Sudipa Banerjee, learned Advocate representing the alleged contemnor submits that the compensation amount has already been disbursed to the petitioners which will be evident from the details of transaction appearing at page 13 (annexure D) to the compliance report. 4. Ms. Paulami Chakraborty, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant-petitioner also submits that the online transaction shows that the amount has been accepted by the petitioners. 2 5. In view of the above, the contempt application being WPCRC 62 of 2026 stands disposed of and rule is discharged. 6. Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)