Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2748 (CHH)

SUB-AREA MANAGER v. SANJAY KUMAR JHA

CONT/1397/2025 · 2026-01-06

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:821 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1397 of 2025 Sub-Area Manager S.E.C.L., Open Cast Mines, P.O. Bishrampur Colliery, District Sarguja, Now District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Sanjay Kumar Jha S/o Late B. N. Jha Aged About 55 Years R/o Shivnandanpur, Bishrampur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shushila Devi W/o Late B. N. Jha Aged About 70 Years R/o Qtr. No. 1 B /8, Bishrampur Colliery, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ashok Jha S/o Late B. N. Jha Aged About 48 Years R/o Qtr. No. 1 B /8, Bishrampur Colliery, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Arun Jha S/o Late B. N. Jha Aged About 46 Years R/o Qtr. No. 1 B /8, Bishrampur Colliery, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Rani Jha D/o Late B. N. Jha Aged About 47 Years R/o Qtr. No. 1 B /8, Bishrampur Colliery, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Anuradha Jha D/o Late B. N. Jha Aged About 44 Years R/o Qtr. No. 1 B /8, Bishrampur Colliery, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate For Respondents : None 2 / 2 S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 07/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this contempt petition under Section 12 of the contempt of court Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging disobedience of order dated 13.11.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 2. Perusal of the order Annexure A-1 would show that the Court while hearing the writ appeal bearing WA No. 626 of 2018 has not passed any order or direction but has disposed of the said writ appeal based on the submission made by counsel for intervener. 3. In the aforementioned facts of the case, this contempt petition would not lie. Petitioner if in any manner is aggrieved with the submission made by learned counsel for intervener then he is having some other remedy available under the law. 4. For the forgoing discussion, I do not find any good ground to contine with this contempt petition. 5. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands dismissed. 6. Notices issued to respondents stands discharged. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza