IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 451 Date of decision: 09.07.2026 1. CWP-14530-2005 (O&M) VANITA SHARMA AND ORS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS 2. CWP-16903-2007 (O&M) RAJINDER MALIK AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 3. CWP-18627-2008 (O&M) ANJU VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : None for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Preeti Jha, Advocate for Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners had prayed to verify as to whether his clients were interested in pursuing their writ petitions as is discernible from order dated 24.09.2014, whereafter there has been no appearance on their behalf. The position remains the same even today, despite the case having been called out twice. 2. Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that cause of action still survives. 3. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file(s). (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 09.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.09 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document