NARRA LAKSHMI PRABHAKAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/35801/2025 · 2026-01-04
D Ramesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27469 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27469 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
APHC010693692025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35801/2025 Between:
1. NARRA LAKSHMI PRABHAKAR, S/O. NARRA LAKSHMI PERUMALLU, AGED 60 YEARS OCC. RETD EMPLOYEE, R/O. H NO. 8-3-168/E/2F149-150/101 RAJIV NAGAR, BESIDE HDFC BANK, HYDERABAD 500 045
2. NARRA BHAVANA, D/O. NARRA LAKSHMI PRABHAKAR, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O. H NO. 8-3-168/F/2/149-150/101 RAJIV NAGAR, BESIDE HDFC BANK, HYDERABAD 500 045
3. NARRA LAKSHMI SAI BHAVESH, S/O. NARRA LAKSHMI PRABHAKAR, AGED 28 YEARS OCC. NIL, RIO. H NO. 8-3- 168/E/2/149-150/101 RAJIV NAGAR, BESIDE HDFC BANK, HYDERABAD 500 045
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI (AP), GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICTCOLLECTOR, NTR DISTRICT (PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT)
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, UNGUTURU DIVISION,
::2::
NTR DISTRICT (PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT)
4. THE TAHSILDAR, UNGUTURU MANDAL NTR DISTRICT (PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT)
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the matter of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the pattadar passbooks and title deeds by mutating the petitioners names in online revenue records in connection with the Agri lands situated in Sy No. 17 (Ac.1.41 1/2 cents), Sy no. 12/1 and 14/1 (Ac.3.94 cents), Sy No. 12/2 (Ac.1.00 cents), Sy No. 14/4 (Ac.2.16 cents) and Sy No 28/6 (Ac.0.007 cents) situated at Velnutala Village, Unguturu Mandal, NTR District (previously Krishna District) by considering the representation dated 01.12.2025 of the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to mutate the petitioners names in online revenue records by issuing the PPSs and TTDs by considering the representation dated 01.12.2025 of the petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. C V BHANOJI RAMARS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
::3::
ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly in the matter of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the pattadar passbooks and title deeds by mutating the petitioners names in online revenue records in connection with the Agri lands situated in Sy No 17 Ac 1 41 1/2 cents Sy no 12/1 and 14/1 Ac 3 94 cents Sy No 12/2 Ac 1 00 cents Sy No 14/4 Ac 2 16 cents and Sy No 28/6 Ac 0 007 cents situated at Velnutala Village Unguturu Mandal NTR District previously Krishna District by considering the representation dated 01 12 2025 of the petitioners is illegal arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 19 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to mutate the petitioners names in online revenue records by issuing the PPSs and TTDs by considering the representation dated 01 12 2025 of the petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass…”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner made a representation dated 01.12.2025 before the respondent authorities under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971, seeking mutation of their names in the online revenue records in respect of the subject land in Sy no. 17 (Ac.1.41 ½
::4::
cents, Sy No. 12/1 & 14/1 (Ac. 3.94 cents), Sy No.12/2 (Ac.1.00 cents), Sy No. 14/4 (Ac.2.16 cents) and Sy No 28/6 (Ac.0.007cents) situated at Velnutala Village, Unguturu Mandal, NTR District (previously Krishna District). It is contended that, despite receipt of the said application, the respondent authorities have neither considered the petitioners’ request nor issued any orders/proceedings till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition.
4. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents, submits that if the petitioners submitted a fresh representation in Form No.6A, the respondent authorities will consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of by directing the petitioners to submit an application in Form No.6A seeking mutation of their names in the online revenue records in respect of the subject property, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation/application in Form No.6A, the respondent authorities
::5::
shall consider the same and, after issuing notice to the petitioners, other legal heirs, if any, and all other stakeholders, including persons claiming rights by way of tenancy, encroachment, or occupation, shall conduct a detailed enquiry. Thereafter, the respondents shall pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of three (03) months.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Dt:05.01.2026 RMD
::6::
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.35801 of 2025
Dt:05.01.2026 RMD
291