1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19109-2026 Date of decision: 08.07.2026 Sr. No.215 Parveen Kumar …..Petitioner VERSUS State Of Haryana and Ors. ….Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Saini, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the present petition is covered against the petitioner by a recent judgment dated 01.07.2026 passed by this Court in CWP-19504-2026 ‘Mamta Devi vs. State of Haryana and Ors.’ . 2. In the light of the above fair stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is also dismissed in terms of Mamta Devi’s case (supra). (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE 08.07.2026 puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No PUNEET SHARMA 2026.07.09 16.22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment