Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27455 (AP)

BODDU VENKATESWARLU v. GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI,I.A.S

CC/781/2023 · 2026-03-05

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010694772022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 781/2023 Between: 1. BODDU VENKATESWARLU, S/O. GOVARDHANA AGED . 55 YEARS, EX-SARPANCH, R/O. CHANDRAPALEEM VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI I A S, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. S S RAWAT, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. KONA SASIDHAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS COMMISSIONER, A.P., PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NH -16 TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. DINESH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR (PANCHAYAT WING) PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 5. K SINAREDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING 2 AS PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DRDA) PROJECT, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 6. J HARI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R.I. DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. THOKALA MOUNIKA, W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS CHANDRAPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, CHANDRAPALEM VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of Order dated 18.07.2022 passed in W.P.No.19097 of 2022 on the file of this Honourable Court provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the order in WP No.19097 of 2022 dt 18.07.2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOLLURI ARJUN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. ASHOK RAM V 2. G VENKATA REDDY-10979/AP/792/2005 3. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 4. OMKAR D The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 781/2023 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 18.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.19097 of 2022. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents furnished written instructions dated 24.12.2025, wherein it is stated that after having vigilance and quality control recoveries, remaining amount was paid to the petitioner on 14.08.2025. In view of the changed circumstances and due to change of the respondents, the petitioner must have been filed a petition impleading the present incumbents who did those vigilance recoveries on the guise of quality control recovery/assessment of the works. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is neither responding nor available for filing implead petition as required and requested to make an order basing upon the written instructions dated 24.12.2025 submitted by the respondents. 5. In view of the compliance reported by the learned counsel for the respondents vide instructions dated 24.12.2025, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 06.03.2026 TTPPSS 5 46 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 781/2023 06.03.2026 TTPPSS