Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27443 (KAR)

SRI.D.CHANDRAIAH v. THE COMMISSISONER

WP/2917/2015 · 2026-06-23

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31426 WP No. 2917 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 2917 OF 2015 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. D.CHANDRAIAH S/O HANUMANTHAPPA HUSBAND OF SMT. NAVARATHNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. KUM. HEMALATHA D/O D. CHANDRAIAH AND SMT. NAVARATHNA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 3. SMT. SHASHIKALA D/O D. CHANDRAIAH AND SMT. NAVARATHNA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 4. SRI. R.P.C.R. NAIDU S/O LATE NARASIMHULU HUSBAND OF SMT. PADMAKALA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 5. KUM. R.P. TEJASWINI D/O R.P.C.R. NAIDU AND SMT. PADMAKALA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 6. KUM. R.P. BINDUSHREE D/O R.P.C.R. NAIDU AND SMT. PADMAKALA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 7. MASTER R.P. LALITH KUMAR S/O R.P.C.R. NAIDU AND SMT. PADMAKALA AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS SINCE MINOR, REP BY HIS FATHER SRI R.P.C.R. NAIDU - PETITIONER-4, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31426 WP No. 2917 of 2015 PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3, 5 AND 6 ARE DULY REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI. R.P.C.R. NAIDU, S/O R. NARASIMHALU AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO. 794, B-TYPE B.D.A. 2ND STAGE, 4TH PHASE DOMLUR LAYOUT BANGALORE-560071 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.S. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560020 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560020 3. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR SALAO SECTION, B D A T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AWARD BEARING NO.BHUSWADHEENADA PRAKARANA SANKHYE (LAC)/289/86-87 DATED 30.04.2010 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-R SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE LAND, THE LAND ACQUISITION MAHAZAR BEARING NO.NIL DATED 22.07.2010, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-S AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31426 WP No. 2917 of 2015 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that in view of the judgment dated 31.01.2023 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.15015/2011 and connected cases, which is confirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10058/2023 vide its order dated 25.08.2025, this petition may be disposed off. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, this writ petition stands disposed off on similar lines as stated in the judgment dated 31.01.2023 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.15015/2011 and connected cases, which is confirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10058/2023 vide its order dated 25.08.2025. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60