[2026:RJ-JP:9035] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 900/2026 Rahul S/o Mormal @ Channu, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Saimla Kalan, Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 26/02/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.88/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 5/8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that all other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court. Learned counsel also submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed in the [2026:RJ-JP:9035] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-900/2026] matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedents. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that other co-accused have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Rahul s/o Mormal @ Channu, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /95