2026:JHHC:29442 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8326 of 2026 Saklen Ansari, aged about 19 years, S/o – Rafaul Ansari, R/o – Village – Barmundi, P.O. + P.S. – Karmatar, District – Jamtara … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, APP --- 07/30.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.27 of 2026, registered under Section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 and Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66(B),66(C),66(D) of IT Act, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026, having no criminal antecedents and the charge sheet has already been submitted. He submits that 1 mobile, 1 SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, which belongs to the petitioner. With respect to 1 victim only, there are 2 transactions totaling Rs.51,000/-. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2026:JHHC:29442 2 satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.27 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:30.09.2026