APHC010694732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13232/2025 Between: AKUNURU NAGARAJU, S/O. VENKATARAMAIH,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO. 67,KANAKA DURGA COLONY, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE,AJITH SINGH NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, NTR DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER,GOVERNERPET, POLICE STATION VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICTREP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. MANNAM RAJA SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner/Accused No.1, in connection with Crime No.103 of 2023 on the file of Governorpet Police Station, NTR Commissionerate, which is registered for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 read with 120 B IPC. 2. Heard Sri Mannam Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State/Respondent. 2 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner has no nexus either with the De facto Complainant or Accused No.5. It is further submitted that the Petitioner did not participate in execution or registration of the alleged sale deeds. Learned counsel would further submit that the allegations made against the Petitioner are vague and omnibus. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail since there are specific allegations made against the Petitioner to attract the alleged offences. 5. Considering the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the material placed on record indicates the involvement of the Petitioner in the transaction in question, which requires thorough investigation. At this stage, the contention that the allegations are vague and omnibus cannot be accepted. The nature and gravity of the offences alleged, coupled with the specific accusations levelled against the Petitioner, disentitle him for relief of anticipatory bail. 6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.01.2026 Dinesh 3 THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13232 of 2025 DATE:22.01.2026 Dinesh