Dr. A.V.Purushotham v. Sri B.Neelakantam and 3 others
CC/2431/2018 · 2026-03-10
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27431 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27431 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010689732018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2431/2018
Between:
1. DR. A.V.PURUSHOTHAM, S/O A. KRISHNA SWAMY, AGED. 59 YEARS, PRINCIPAL, MSN DEGREE COLLEGE,
KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI B NEELAKANTAM AND 3 OTHERS, CORRESPONDENT, MSN DEGREE COLLEGE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2. SRI M SIVARAMA NAICKER, CHAIRMAN,GOVERNING BODY, MSN DEGREE COLLEGE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. DR K PRAMILA, REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGE EDUCATION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. SMT SUJATHA SHARMA IAS, SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGE EDUCATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ANR TOWERS, JAMMITCHETTU ROAD, OPP. TOYOTA SHOW ROOM PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for contempt of court under Contempt of Courts Act for willfully not implementing and violating the orders of the Hon'ble High Court dt.14.09.2017 in Writ Petition No. 31050 of 2017 which was extended until further orders by order dt.23.11.2017 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P V KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2431 of 2018 The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the main WP No.31050 of 2017 itself was dismissed on 25.04.2025 and as such, petitioner is not intending to pursue the present Contempt Case.
2. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed, with a liberty to the petitioner to avail legal remedies in accordance with the law. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 11.03.2026 PSA