Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2743 (GAU)

VIKRAM SINGH CHIB v. AJAY KUMAR BHATTA AND 2 ORS

Cont.Cas(C)/410/2024 · 2026-03-05

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010150372024 2026:GAU-AS:3296 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/410/2024 VIKRAM SINGH CHIB S/O- SRI BAJ SINGH, R/O- VILL.- FLORA, P.S. DOMANA, DIST. JAMMU (J AND K). VERSUS AJAY KUMAR BHATTA AND 2 ORS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI. 2:x Struck off vide odr. dtd.25.9.2025 3:ABISHEK ANAND THE COMMANDANT 33 BN SSB KEWATI P.O. KEWATI P.S. BHANU PRATAP- PUR DIST. KANKER CHHATISHGARH Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J I BORBHUIYA, MRS. K H CHOUDHURY,MR. L MOHAN Advocate for the Respondent : MS. B SARMA (R-3), BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R Page No.# 2/2 06.03.2026 1. Ms. B Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 submits that the order dated 14.12.2023 passed in WP(C) No. 30/2015 has been interfered by a Division Bench in WA No. 384/2025 and therefore, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present contempt petition. 2. However, Mr. JI Borbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has approached the Hon’ble Apex Court assailing the judgment of the Division Bench passed in WA No. 384/2025. 3. Be that as it may, since the Davison Bench has interfered with the order dated 14.12.2023 passed in WP(C) No. 30/2015, the contempt petition stands closed. 4. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application to revive this contempt petition in the event the judgment of the Division Bench is reversed by the Hon’ble Apex Court. JUDGE Comparing Assistant