Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27428 (KAR)

SRI. RANGAIAH DEAD BY HIS LRS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/44242/2015 · 2026-06-29

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32399 WP No. 44242 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 44242 OF 2015 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RANGAIAH DEAD BY HIS LRS 1(a) SMT.LOKAMMA, D/O LATE RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 1(b) SRI. SEEBIRANGAIAH S/O LATE RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, BOTH THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT NELAHAL VILLAGE, BELLAVI HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN CODE:572 128 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ADAVEESHAIAH B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, GROUND FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, NEAR BASAVESWARA CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001 REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32399 WP No. 44242 of 2015 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB, B.H.ROAD, NEAR SIT COLLEGE, TUMAKURU-572 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. POOJA M. KOORSE, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. ASHOK N NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE PETITIONERS AN OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD IN LAND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN NOTIFICATION NO.CI:07:SPQ:2014 DATED 10.03.2015 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28[1] OF KIAD ACT 1966 WITH RESPECT TO PETITIONERS LAND AS PER ANNEXURE-D BY SERVING NOTICES TO PETITIONERS AS CONTEMPLATED UNDER SECTION 28[2] OF KIAD ACT AS PERSON INTERESTED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the respondents for payment of compensation and to avail all other remedies available in accordance with law. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32399 WP No. 44242 of 2015 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. It is always open for the petitioners to approach the respondents for payment of compensation in accordance with law. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4