Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27428 (AP)

Vakacharla Vasanthi v. THE STATE OF AP

CRLP/13308/2025 · 2026-03-17

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010689082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13308/2025 Between: 1. VAKACHARLA VASANTHI, W/O VAKACHARLA VEERA VENKATASATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O SRI NAGARSTREET, MANDAPETA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT -533308. 2. CHEKKA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O PATTABHIRAMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 88YEARS, R/O SRINAGAR, 5TH STREET, MANDAPETA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKARKONASEEMA DISTRICT. 3. CHAKKA NAGAMANI, W/O CHEKKA NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 82YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O SRINAGAR, 5TH STREET, MANDAPETA -533308. 4. VAKACHARLA SOWRYA GUPTA, S/O VAKACHARLA VEERA VENKATASATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O SRI NAGARSTREET, MANDAPETA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT -533308. 5. OBILISETTI MALLIKARJUN RAO, S/O RUDRAYYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCCBUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO.2-22, MAIN ROAD, PEDAPUDI VILLAGE MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533006. 6. OBILISETTI SATYAVENI, W/O OBILISETTI MALLIKARJUN RAO, AGED ABOUT 41YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O DOOR NO.2-22, MAIN ROAD, PEDAPUDIVILLAGE MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533006. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) 2 AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGHCOURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. GRANDHI SURYA VENKATA PRAKASH RAO, S/O LATE VEERA BHADRA RAO,AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O THAPESWARAM VILLAGE, MANDAPETAMANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): MAKIREDDY MANOJ Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. D TARAKA PRASAD 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 18.03.2026 RSI 3 61 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.13308 of 2025 Date: 18.03.2026 RSI