Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27425 (AP)

Alapati Satyanarayana v. The Eastern Power Distribution company

WP/14162/2011 · 2026-03-09

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010696182011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 14162/2011 Between: 1. ALAPATI SATYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE ANJANEYULU, RESIDING AT 2-71, MARKONDAPADU, CHAGALLU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN HYDERABAD 2. THE DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.TRANSCO, NIDADOVOLU, W.G.DISTRICT 3. THE ASSISTANT, ENGINEER, A.P.TRANSCO, CHAGALLU, W.G.DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SREERAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO NJS,J W.P No.14162 of 2011 2 The Court made the following Order: At the time of considering the matter, it is noted that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. 2. Heard Ms. Aishwarya Chowdary, learned Junior Standing Counsel for A.P.E.P.D.C.L. 3. The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents no to lay any electrical wires in his land in R.S Nos.13/2B, 13/3, 13/4B and 13/2 situate in Markondapadu Village of Chagally Mandal, West Godavari District. 4. In the light of the instructions received by the learned Junior Standing Counsel, a copy of which is placed for perusal of this Court, this writ petition is being disposed of. 5. In the said written instructions, it is inter alia stated as follows:- “While objections raised by the petitioner, the proposed estimate i.e releasing the service connection with the existing 11kv lines passing through the petitioner’s fields was changed by releasing the service connections with 11kv Nelaturu feeder without touching a single inch of Petitioner’s land”. 6. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:10.03.2026 Ksj