Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27423 (KAR)

SRI H VIJAYAKUMAR HEGGEDE v. THE MANAGER

MFA/6267/2022 · 2026-07-08

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34374 MFA No. 6267 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6267 OF 2022 (MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. H.VIJAYAKUMAR HEGGEDE SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS, SMT. VASANTHI, W/O LATE VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 2. SMT. AMRUTHA V D/O LATE VIJAY KUMAR, W/O SUBHASH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 3. MISS AKSHATHA V D/O LATE VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.814, SEETHAPPA LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, ACHARYA COLLEGE, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH 560 032. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHRIPAD V. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34374 MFA No. 6267 of 2022 AND: 1. THE MANAGER THE TATA AIG GENEARL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.69, 2ND FLOOR, J P AND DEVI JAMBUKESHWAR ARCADE, MILLERS ROAD, BANGALORE 52. 2. MR. L.NANJAPPA, S/O LAKKAPPA, R/AT NO.232, SHARADAMBA NILAYA, KUNTE NANJAPPA ROAD, BYATARAJANAPURA, SAHAKARANAGAR, BENGALURU 560 092. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; V/O/D 08.07.2026 NOTICE TO R-2 IS D/W) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.03.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.4778/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MACT, BENGALURU CITY (SCCH-4). THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34374 MFA No. 6267 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The claimant/appellants, being dissatisfied with the compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- awarded by the Tribunal, is in appeal. 2. The fact that the accident occurred and the further fact that the offending vehicle was insured is not in dispute. 3. The Tribunal, on assessment of evidence, has awarded global compensation of Rs.2,00,000/-. 4. Having regard to the nature, gravity and the lasting effects of the injuries suffered by the claimant, I deem it appropriate that instead of enhancing the sum under each head, it would be just and appropriate to award additional compensation of Rs.50,000/- as a global compensation, in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal i.e., Rs.2,00,000/-. Thus, the claimant is held entitled to the total compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- as against Rs.2,00,000/-, along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till its realization. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34374 MFA No. 6267 of 2022 5. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the amount of additional compensation awarded within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. 6. Accordingly, in modification of the impugned judgment and award of the Tribunal to the above extent, the appeal is partly allowed. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12