1 CGHC010039502021 2026:CGHC:30010 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1135 of 2021 1 - Hargovind S/o Late Shri Derharam, Aged About 64 Years, 2 - Gopeshwar, S/o Late Shri Derharam, Aged About 60 Years, 3 - Rameshwar, S/o Late Shri Derharam, Aged About 55 Years, 4 - Ravipal S/o Late Shri Derharam, Aged About 50 Years, 5 - Rajesh S/o Late Shri Derharan, Aged About 45 Years, All are R/o Village Pendri, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resource, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Land Acquisition Officer/ Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.07.16 11:37:21 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Bharat Lal Sahu, Advocate. For State/respondents : Mr. Karan Bahrani, PL. SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 15/07/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “(i)That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the petitioner's case, in the interest of justice. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 24.12.2020 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Collector, Bilaspur, in the interest of justice. (iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to enhance /modify the amount of compensation award by the learned land acquisition officer, in the interest of justice. (iv) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. On the objection being raised by the learned counsel for the State that against the order impugned, the petitioners are having remedy of filing an appeal, counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file the appropriate proceedings. He also submits that direction be issued to return back the certified copies of the documents. 3 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings. 4. Registry is directed to return back the certified copies of the documents enclosed along with the writ petition after retaining photo copies of the same. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge gouri