Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27413 (AP)

Uppala Siva Kumari v. S. Satyanarayana, IAS

CC/4068/2025 · 2026-03-12

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010688982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4068/2025 Between: 1. UPPALA SIVA KUMARI,, W/O. GOPALARAO, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. 4-31, REGULAGADDA (V) MACHAVARAM MANDALAM, PALNADU DIST (BEFORE GUNTUR DIST.) ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SATYANARAYANA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, BC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522237. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR GARU IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522237. 3. DR A MALLIKARJUNA IAS, DIRECTOR, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VISHAL RESIDENCY, NEAR VR SIDDHARTHA ENGINEERING COLLEGE TADIGADAPA, KANURU AREA, VIJAYAWADA. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 23.09.2025 in W.P. No. 23889 of 2025 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Copy of Order dated 23.09.2025 in W.P. No. 23889 of 2025 passed by the Hon’ble High Court and to pass such SRK, J CC No.4068 of 2025 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y KAMALA RANI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. U KANAKA RAJU 2. The Court made the following ORDER: This Contempt Case has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 23.09.2025 passed by this Court in WP No.23889 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, since the respondents have complied with the order of this Court, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this Contempt Case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:13.03.2026 sj SRK, J CC No.4068 of 2025 3 189 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Contempt Case No.4068 of 2025 Date:13.03.2026 sj