1 CGHC010172492026 2026:CGHC:29998 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4066 of 2026 Ratiram Sidar S/o Anjor Singh Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Anwalachakka, Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Station House Officer, Police of Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Chandra, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 15.07.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 126/2026, registered at Police Station Saraipali, District – Mahasamund (C.G) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2. As per the prosecution case, on 12.04.2026, the police of Police Station Saraipali allegedly received secret information. Acting upon the said information, the police conducted a raid and allegedly recovered 30.060 bulk litres of illicit liquor from the possession of the present applicant. ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2026.07.16 15:59:18 +0530 2 Consequently, the aforesaid crime was registered against the applicant, and he was arrested. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and no seizure has been made from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that the present applicant has no criminal antecedents. He also submits that under Sections 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years and the applicant has been in jail since 12.04.2026 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for releasing the applicant on regular bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel appearing for the State/non- applicant opposes the bail application and submits that in the present case charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court. She submits that the present applicant has 02 criminal antecedents of the similar nature, which shows that the present applicant is a habitual offender. As such, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case also considering the fact that the applicant has 02 criminal antecedents of the similar nature, shows that the present applicant is a habitual offender and also in light of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another, reported in (2022) 8 SCC 559, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court had cancelled the bail granted to the accused therein on the ground that the accused had previous antecedents, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the bail application of the 3 applicant – Ratiram Sidar, involved in Crime No. 126/2026, registered at Police Station Saraipali, District – Mahasamund (C.G) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, is rejected. 7. Needless to say that the trial Court concerned is at liberty to proceed and conclude the trial expeditiously. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Abhishek