Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27406 (JHR)

UDAY SHANKAR GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/7622/2026 · 2026-09-29

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:29201 1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7622 of 2026 ----- Uday Shankar Gupta, S/o Late Salikram Sahu @ Saligram Sahu, R/o Court Road Lohardaga, P.O., P.S. & District- Lohardaga .......... Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reform, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 4. Circle Officer, Ormanjhi, Ranchi 5. Circle Inspector, Ormanjhi, Ranchi 6. Sushma Sinha, W/o Raj Kappor Sinha, R/o Flat No. 701, Sri Ram Regency Koyla Vihar, Circular Road, near Hari Om Tower, P.O. & P.S.-Lalpur, District-Ranchi .......... Respondents ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Roy, Sr. Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Shalini Shahdeo, AC to SC (L&)-I ----- Order No.02 Date: 29.09.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing of order dated 31.07.2025 (Annexure-10 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent No. 4 in Mutation Case No. 837 of 2025-26, whereby the application preferred by the private respondent (respondent No. 6) seeking mutation of the land appertaining to Khata No. 31, Plot No. 1064, Halka No. 3, Mouza-Ormanjhi, District-Ranchi, measuring an area of 18 decimals and the land appertaining to Khata No. 31, Plot No. 1071, Halka No. 3, Mouza-Ormanjhi, District-Ranchi, measuring an area of 28 decimals has been allowed with a further direction to update the Register-II. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of 2026:JHHC:29201 2 | P a g e preferring an appeal against the order dated 31.07.2025 under Section 15 of the Bihar Tenants Holdings (Maintenance of Records) Act, 1973, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage. 3. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to prefer an appeal against the order dated 31.07.2025 passed by the respondent No. 4. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 29.09.2026 Vikas/ Uploaded on 29.09.2026