Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.07.2026 Court No.28 Item No.92 tbsr Reject CRM (A) 1649 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Rajarhat P.S. Case No.61 of 2026 dated 13.03.2026 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c)/25/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of: Hasanur Mondal
….Petitioner.
Mr. Shashanka Sekhar Saha
….for the petitioner
Ms. Koel Mukherjee
….for the State
Report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the only material available against the petitioner is the statement of a co-accused, which is not admissible in evidence. Charge sheet has been submitted.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on a report, the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that other than the material available in the case diary, there are four criminal antecedents of the petitioner, out of which two were under the NDPS Act.
Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.
2
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)