Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2740 (RAJ)

SURENDRA @ LEHRU S/O SHRI SANJAY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2926/2026 · 2026-02-26

Sandeep Taneja

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9012] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2926/2026 Surendra @ Lehru S/o Shri Sanjay, R/o Ghadi Jalim Singh, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jeetendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 26/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.21/2026 registered at Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur for offence(s) under Section(s) 305(2), 331(4), 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court, vide order dated 16.02.2026. Learned counsel also submits that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate; the petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2026, no further recovery is required to be made from him and investigation / trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose [2026:RJ-JP:9012] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2926/2026] would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore, prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that petitioner has criminal antecedents against him. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the offences are triable by the Magistrate and investigation / trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Surendra @ Lehru S/o Shri Sanjay is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/68