CWP-19907-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 133 IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED HARYANA COMMISSION CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate and Mr. Rajpal, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the Redressal Commission IA no.1186 of 2026 dated and interim direction expeditiously with 2. Learned counsel submits that Redressal Commission while deciding complaint no.226 of 201 party no.1 therein) ₹2,31,340 along with from 20.03.201 therein). The petitioner was 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED Versus HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate and Mr. Rajpal, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, directing the first respondent - Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to advance the date of hearing IA no.1186 of 2026 dated 25.05.2026, Annexure P and interim directions in the first appeal (FA no.320 of 2026 within a specified time. Learned counsel submits that the District Redressal Commission passed an order dated 05.09.2023 deciding complaint no.226 of 2019, directing the petitioner party no.1 therein) to make payment of foreclosure charges amount along with simple interest at the rate of eight per cent 20.03.2019 till its realisation to respondents no.2 to 5 . The petitioner was proceeded against IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19907-2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 …Petitioner(s) STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate and , inter alia, seeking a writ of Haryana State Consumer Disputes to advance the date of hearing of the application - exure P-10, seeking early hearing FA no.320 of 2026) and decide it the District Consumer Disputes passed an order dated 05.09.2023, Annexure P-6, , directing the petitioner (opposite to make payment of foreclosure charges amounting simple interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum to respondents no.2 to 5 (complainants proceeded against ex parte. On coming to know STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL a writ of Haryana State Consumer Disputes - seeking early hearing ) and decide it Disputes , (opposite ing per annum (complainants . On coming to know AMAN DUA 2026.07.09 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-19907-202 of the said Commission under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, along with an application delay in filing the appeal also moved. The Commission issued notice dated 25.03.2026 respondents filed execution petition before the District Commission, wherein bailable warrants were issued vide order dated Thereafter, the petitioner moved aforementioned application for advancing the date of hearing of the appeal However, the Commission vide order dated to 17.11.2026, awaiting service counsel further petitioner in case his application seeking up and decided appeal the petitioner dated 05.09.2023 per cent amount within 3. Considering the facts aforementioned and urgency of the matter in view of the pending execution application before the District Commission execution proceedings dated 25.05.2026 depositing the remaining fifty per cent with the State Commission 2026 -2- order, aforementioned appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, along with an application seeking stay on the order dated delay in filing the appeal, and an application The Commission issued notice 25.03.2026, Annexure P-8, for 12.11.2026 respondents filed execution petition before the District Commission, wherein rants were issued vide order dated , the petitioner moved aforementioned application for advancing the date of hearing of the appeal However, the Commission vide order dated 29.05.2026 , awaiting service upon the respondents/complainant further submits that an irreparable loss petitioner in case his application seeking stay of the decided urgently. He also submits that at the time appeal the petitioner deposited fifty per cent of the amount 05.09.2023, i.e., ₹2,19,483, and is willing amount within a week from today. Considering the facts aforementioned and the matter in view of the pending execution application before the District Commission, this Court deems it execution proceedings shall remain stayed till the petitioner’s stay application 25.05.2026 is decided by the State Commission, subject to his depositing the remaining fifty per cent awarded amount with the State Commission within a period of ten days from today. aforementioned appeal was filed before the State under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, along order dated 05.09.2023. There was a and an application for condonation of delay was The Commission issued notice on the application vide order 12.11.2026. In the meanwhile, the respondents filed execution petition before the District Commission, wherein rants were issued vide order dated 02.06.2026, Annexure P-12. , the petitioner moved aforementioned application dated 25.05.2026 for advancing the date of hearing of the appeal and issuing interim directions. 29.05.2026, adjourned the appeal the respondents/complainants. Learned irreparable loss would be caused to the stay of the ex parte order is not taken that at the time of filing of the of the amount awarded vide order , and is willing to deposit the remaining fifty Considering the facts aforementioned and having regard to the the matter in view of the pending execution application before the it appropriate to direct that the till the petitioner’s stay application State Commission, subject to his awarded amount along with interest within a period of ten days from today. State under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, along . There was a condonation of delay was vide order . In the meanwhile, the respondents filed execution petition before the District Commission, wherein . dated 25.05.2026 . , adjourned the appeal earned be caused to the taken of filing of the order fifty the the matter in view of the pending execution application before the direct that the till the petitioner’s stay application State Commission, subject to his along with interest AMAN DUA 2026.07.09 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-19907-202 4. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 06.07.2026 Ad 2026 -3- The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.09 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document