Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2026 DAILYLAW 27396 (KAR)
SRI. M. MANJUNATHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/19538/2026 · 2026-06-30
R Nataraj
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27396 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27396 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32604 WP No. 19538 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 19538 OF 2026 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. M. MANJUNATHA S/O MUNI SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, MAYASANDRA, YALAMMA DEVASTANA ROAD, MAYASANDRA, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE - 562107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHANANJAYA C.P., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE- 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
2.
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT) 3RD FLOOR, SAMPARK SOUDHA, IN FRONT OF ORAYAN MALL, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. POOJA M. KOORSE, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1)
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32604 WP No. 19538 of 2026
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO WITHDRAW THE PERSONAL INTIMATION LETTER DATED 23.03.2026 VIDE NO.PÀgÀC¤¤/¨sÀƸÁé/©.J¸ï.Dgï.-04/2025-26 VIDE ANNEXURE-D ACQUIRING 0.03.04 GUNTA OUT OF 0.05.08 GUNTA OF SY. NO.363/2 OF MAYASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ACQUIRE LAND TOWARDS THE LAKE SIDE OF THE CURRENTLY PROPOSED ROAD AND CONSTRUCT A ROAD, JUST AS THE ROAD HAS ALREADY BEEN CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE LAKE SIDE BY NATIONAL HIGHWAY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, sought permission to withdraw this writ petition.
2. His submission is noted. In view of his submission, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41