Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27392 (CHH)

PRABHAKAR MISHRA v. JSW STEEL LIMITED

REVP/208/2026 · 2026-07-14

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010244782026 2026:CGHC:30067-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 208 of 2026 {Arising out of order dated 10-10-2025 passed in WPC No.4819/2022} Prabhakar Mishra, S/o Shri Nalnikant Mishra, aged about 42 years, R/o Ward No.16, Gram Pausari, Gram Panchayat Bharuwadih, Post Office Champa, Tehsil Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh – 493332, presently Member (Ward No.15), Gram Pausari, Gram Panchayat Bharuwadih and the Authorized Person on behalf of Gram Panchayat Bharuwadih, Post Office Champa, Tehsil Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Review Petitioner versus 1. JSW Steel Limited, (Formerly M/s Monnet Ispat & Energy Limited), having its plant office at Village Naharpali, Tehsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, Through its Authorized signatory Shri K.P.S. Channi. (Petitioner) 2. Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110001 (Respondent No.1) 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mineral Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No.2) 4. Additional Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mineral Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No.3) 5. Director, Directorate of Geology and Mining, Indravati Bhavan, Part – 4, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.4) 6. Joint Director, Directorate of Geology and Mining, Indravati Bhavan, Part – 4, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.5) SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.07.16 13:34:18 +0530 2 7. Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India, Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jorbagh-Road, New Delhi – 110003 8. Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, Through its Member Secretary at Paryavas Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 9. Regional Officer, Regional Office, Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, New Office Building, Ring Road No.2, Tatiband, Raipur (C.G.) 10. Divisional Forest Officer, Raipur Division, District Raipur (C.G.) 11. Office of the Collector & District Magistrate, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Collectorate Premises, Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh 493332 12.Additional Collector, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Collectorate Premises, Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh 493332 13.Deputy Collector, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Collectorate Premises, Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh 493332 14.Tehsildar, Baloda Bazar, Tehsil Office Complex, Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh 493332 ... Respondents Division Bench: - Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon’ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, JJ Order (In Chamber) (15/07/2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. This review petition is filed for review / recall of order dated 10-10- 2025 passed by this Court in WPC No.4819/2022 and it has been taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’). 3 2. We have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. Two writ petitions i.e. WPC Nos.4817/2022 & 4819/2022, were heard on 8-9-2025 and the order was delivered on 10-10-2025. The review petitioner herein was neither party before the writ court nor he had participated in any other proceedings before the authorities. In that view of the matter, we do not find any merit in the review petition on the ground of delay as well as on merits and on account of locus also and as such, the review petition cannot be entertained. 4. Thus, after going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the order under review, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of order dated 10-10-2025 passed by this Court in WPC No.4819/2022. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the order under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge Soma