( 2026:JHHC:29126 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9058 of 2026 ------ Muneshwar Ganjhu @ Vikram Ji, aged about 21 years, son of Amrit Ganjhu, resident of Village Patal (Damaru), P.O. and P.S.-Keredari, District-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Budmu P.S. Case No. 83 of 2021 corresponding to S.T. Case No.311 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 25(1-A)/25 (1-B)a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of CLA Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of TPC extremist organization assembled to commit dacoity, but on seeing the police party, he fled away from the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that so far 02 witnesses have been examined during the trial and both of them have not identified the petitioner; as the name of the petitioner was only disclosed by the co-accused person and except the confessional statement of the co-accused person, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.12.2024 as has been mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned AJC-XIII-cum-Special Judge-III, CBI (Other than AHD), Ranchi in connection with Budmu P.S. Case No. 83 of 2021 corresponding to S.T. Case No.311 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28/09/2026 Abhiraj/