Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27380 (CAL)

NARAYAN BAIDYA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

MAT/473/2021 · 2026-07-10

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10th July, 2026 (D/L No.26) Ct. No.4 (SKB) M.A.T. 473 of 2021 With CAN 1 of 2021 Narayan Baidya Versus The State of West Bengal and others Mrs. Chandreyi Alam, ld. AGP, Ms. Runu Mukherjee … for the State. 1. There is none to represent the appellant. No accommodation is sought for. State is represented by the learned AGP. 2. It appears that on earlier occasions i.e. on 27.04.2021 and 17.11.2021 there was also none to represent the appellant. It appears that the appellant has lost interest to proceed with the matter. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. Connected application stands dismissed. 4. Interim order/s, if any, stands vacated. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)