- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33341 WP No. 26408 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 26408 OF 2025 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RANVINDRA SHETTIGARA S/O. KARIYA SHETTIGAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.2061, 9TH BLOCK, NEAR VIDHYANIKETAN SCHOOL SIR M. VISVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT BENGALURU-560066 2. SRI. SRIKANTH K.S., S/O. SRI. SHANKARAPPA K.N., AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.21, 2ND CROSS ROAD, NEAR PAVITHRA VIDYA MANDIR, UDAYA LAYOUT, MANGANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560060 3. SRI. E. RAJESH, S/O. LATE E. BABU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.22-976/6A, VRUNDAVAN COLONY, MURUGANAPALLI, CHITTORU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517001 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R.P. SOMASHEKHARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33341 WP No. 26408 of 2025 M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 4TH SUB-DIVISION, NADAPRABHU KEMPEGOWDA LAYOUT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU-560020. 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. POOJA M. KOORSE, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE NO.BDA/SA.KA.A-4/NPKL/71/2025-26 DATED NIL, ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 UNDER ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33341 WP No. 26408 of 2025 petition as there is no threat of eviction and has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. He has also sought for liberty to file a petition if any threat occurs in future. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If the petitioners have an independent cause of action to approach this Court than the one urged in this petition, they are always at liberty to file a fresh petition. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12