Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27367 (AP)

PESALA RAMU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/35334/2025 · 2026-02-23

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010689412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 35334/2025 Between: 1. PESALA RAMU, S/O VENKATA KRISHNIAH AGED 55 YEARS, R/O 27/1/982, BALAJI NAGAR CPM OFFICE BACK SIDE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522237 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. -524345 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. -524345 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. -524345 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524345 6. DEVARAM PRASAD REDDY, S/O EEREDDY AGE 70 YRS, R/O RAMNAGAR, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. - 524345 7. D AMARNATH REDDY, S/O PRASAD REDDY AGE 50 YEARS, R/O RAMNAGAR, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. - 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.35334 of 2025 Dated 24.02.2026 524345 8. BUDUGU NAVEEN, S/O PRASAD AGE 45 YRS R/O BUDE SAHEB VEEDHI PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. - 524345 9. POTHINENI MASTHAN NAIDU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGE 45 YRS,TEACHERS COLONY, RAM NAGAR GATE PODALAKUR VILLAGE/MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT -524345 10. S K KAREEMULLAH, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGE 40 YRS, AYYAPPA NAGAR, RAM NAGAR GATE PODALAKUR VILLAGE/MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. -524345 11. 11. G MAHESH GOUD, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGE 50 YRS, AYYAPPA NAGAR, RAM NAGAR GATE PODALAKUR VILLAGE/MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. -524345 12. 12. SIVACHARI, S/O BRAHMAYYA AGE 45 YRS. RAM NAGAR GATE PODALAKUR VILLAGE/MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. - 52345 13. 13. GALI VENKATESH, S/O CHALAPTHI AGE 45 YRS. RAM NAGAR GATE PODALAKUR VILLAGE/MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. -524345 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: GRANDHI PRIYANKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.35334 of 2025 Dated 24.02.2026 ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3RD respondent in resorting to settle civil disputes and thereby interfering with the property rights of the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the 3RD respondents not to interfere with the property rights of the petitioners in any manner in respect of land situated in situated in Sy No. 502-A/2 for an extent of 18 Ankanams land in Podalakur Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and to pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Ms. Grandhi Priyanka, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent No.3 is interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and unofficial respondent and are summoning the petitioner to the police station in connection with a purely civil dispute. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that basing on a call from the villagers of the Podalakur stating that the petitioner and his group are tried to demolish temple porch (mandapam), the 5th respondent along with his staff went and pacified the situation and sent requisition to the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Podalakur to bound over both the petitioner and the unofficial respondents under section 126(E) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’). It is further submitted that 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.35334 of 2025 Dated 24.02.2026 respondent No.3 neither harassed nor threatened the petitioner and urged to dismiss the writ petition. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 not to further call the petitioner at the behest of unofficial respondents in connection with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and unofficial respondents and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. However, if any crime is registered against the petitioner, the police are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 24.02.2026 PBS 5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.35334 of 2025 Dated 24.02.2026 171 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 35334 of 2025 Date: 24.02.2026 PBS