125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19956-2026 Date of decision: 06.07.2026 Ramesh Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that in the present case, the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing petition under Section 7 of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 as the said provision entitles even an individual to file a petition. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case he wishes to agitate the present case. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 06.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.08 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document