Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2735 (ORI)

NIRANJAN MOHAPATRA v. JAGNESWAR JENA BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER BASTA,BALASORE

CONTC/461/2026 · 2026-03-13

Dixit K S

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.461 of 2026 Niranjan Mohapatra …. Petitioner Mr.S.K. Mishra, Advocate -versus- Jagneswar Jena, BEO, Balasore …. Opp. Party Mr.S.B.Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE KRISHNA SHRIPAD DIXIT Order No. 04. ORDER 13.03.2026 This Court, vide order dated 10.09.2025 entered in complainant’s W.P.(C) No.27083 of 2025, has observed as under: “2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that essentially the duty lies in supplying all necessary records, as are reflected in Aniiexure-5 series, with OP No. 4 and for taking an effective decision by OP No.5, in that connection. He submits that unless this Court intervenes, the papers should not move from one office to another. 3. Learned AGA-Mr. Mohanty appearing for the OPs very fairly submits that he would instruct to OP No.4 to do the needful by sending all the necessary records to OP No.5 and that the OP No.5 shall take the decision in accordance with law within an outer limit of eight weeks, if all contentions are kept open. This satisfies learned counsel for the Petitioner. In the above circumstances, writ petition is disposed off fixing a period of eight weeks for accomplishing the task and to inform result of such accomplishment to the Petition in writing. All contentions are kept open. It is open to solicit any information or documents from the side of the Petition as are required for decision making…” Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Designation: ADDL. DY. REGISTRAR-CUM-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK Date: 16-Mar-2026 14:29:38 Signature Not Verified p. 2 The complaint is that this order has not been complied with. After service of notice, the contemnors have placed on record a copy of letter dated 12.03.2023 sent by the Controller of Accounts, Odisha to the Office of the Advocate General. Unnumbered para-2 in the said letter reads as under: “In this context it may be stated here that the Controller of Accounts, Odisha in consultation with the BEO, Basta, after verifying the available records has authorized the available balance of final payment of GPF Rs.1,35,053/- vide GPF Authority No.6683 dt.13.01.2026 (Copy Enclosed) after adjusting the Opening Balance and the same has been disbursed vide Treasury Voucher No.624 Dt.17.01.2026 in favour Sri Mohapatra. Hence, at this point of time, there is no more further GPF amount of the petitioner pending at the level of the Controller of Accounts, Odisha for payment. So, the order Dt.10.09 2025 of the Hon'ble Court has been fully complied with by the Controller of Accounts, Odisha” In the above circumstances, there is substantial compliance of the order whose violation is complained of and therefore, this contempt proceeding is liable to be dropped with liberty to the complainant to work out remainder of the grievance. In that connection, all contentions of the parties are kept open. Ordered accordingly. (Krishna Shripad Dixit) Judge Basu Designation: ADDL. DY. REGISTRAR-CUM-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY